http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31801192
“Protestors in Wisconsin took to the streets for a third day over the shooting of an unarmed black teenager by a white police officer.
More than 100 people marched to the state's Capitol in Madison on Sunday, beating drums and holding placards.
Nineteen-year-old Tony Robinson Jr was shot on Friday evening in an apartment. He was unarmed, but police say he attacked the officer who shot him.”
If protesters in Wisconsin are taking to the street shooting of an unarmed black teenager then according to the community the police did something wrong. If according to the community the police did something wrong there then both groups should be questioned. If both groups should be questioned then both groups lack credibility. If both groups lack credibility then the one with most education should be trusted. If the one with most education should be trusted then it is the police. If the police have traditionally been informed longer with reference to the law then the police should be trusted. Therefore, the case conclusion is to be in favor of the police side.
‘More than 100 people marched to the state’s Capitol’ so there is a great effect. The people there are beating drums and holding placards. If they are beating drums and holding placards then they are making a lot of noise and trying to send messages. If they are making a lot of noise and trying to send messages then they are trying to establish something. If they are trying to establish something then they are doing it through noise and traditional means. However, traditional means will not work. They are trying to send a message by holding signs. The message is obsolete. Recently, the Occupy Wall-street protests were a failure. Therefore, so are these protests. Furthermore, if they are attempting to do a protest they are only making sound. Therefore, their goals have failed already. Compared to the police, who are only doing their job by ending a loud protest; the protesters may have made noise over an untrue point.
Tony Robinson Jr. attacked the officer who went into his apartment. Therefore, Tony Robinson Jr. was wrong. If the police officers were allowed to go in then Tony Robinson Jr. only had to let them do their work. If Tony Robinson Jr. only had to let them do their work then he made a mistake. If Tony Robinson Jr. made a mistake then he was wrong. If Robinson Jr. was wrong then because Tony Robinson Jr. had made armed robberies, as the article shows, then he deserved to die. If he deserved to die then the protests are void.
In my judgment, if a person takes another’s items by force then the person deserves death. Therefore, the protests are void and Tony Robinson’s Jr.’s death is unimportant.
No comments:
Post a Comment