What political system provides its population the maximum amount of happiness?
In my judgment, The Communist Party provides its population the maximum amount of happiness. The reasons I have for concluding this are: 1. Economically, satisfying work is abundant 2. Socially, crime is significantly reduced, and 3. Politically, important decisions nation-wide in effect are made more quickly. The result is a government that provides greater and faster facilitation of the fulfillment of its people's lives. Therefore, The Communist Party provides its population the maximum amount of happiness.
Firstly, the economy of a Socialist country is abundant with satisfying work. If the economy of a Socialist country is abundant with satisfying work, then the people find more fulfillment. So they are more happy in a government that is in accordance with the principles of Communism and Socialism. One of the tenets of The Communist Manifesto, written by the deceased politics and economics writer Karl Marx, is that industrial manufacture be accorded a high level of importance and that it be integrated with public education. If this system is used then the level of work increases. This work requires laborers, engineers, and scientists. So the economy will demand a greater number of workers. So there will be plenty of work. In our modern era, our devices are complex and technological in nature. Therefore, there is a lot of satisfying work in the economy of the Communist Party. Therefore, The Communist Party is superior at economically providing happiness.
Secondly, the society of The Communist Party has significantly reduced levels of crime. In the 20th century there was a great Socialist leader named Joseph Stalin. Joseph Stalin had many of his political opponents executed. Joseph Stalin was the leader and dictator of the United Soviet Socialist Republic of Russia, the USSR in Europe. He had them executed because they did not follow the doctrine of the Communist Party. This made decisions occur more quickly and adherence to the party more effective. If there is a greater aherence to the Party, then there is more realization of ecnomic prosperity, so there is greater happiness due to the reduced levels of crime. Therefore, The Communist Party is superior at socially providing happiness. Executions are also an efficient and effective method at deterring crime, instilling fear of criminality in the people and respect for the law.
Thirdly, the politics of the Communist Party allow for important decisions nation-wide in effect to be made much more quickly. If political decisions are made more quickly then the ends of the government are manifested fast. If there are results made in a short amount of time then the people are going to be happy with the efficient, speedy work of the government. Therefore the efficiency of the politics of the Communist government contributes to its superiority as a political system. For example, if there is a dictator, a "representative of the proletariat," proletariat being the working class, then by default he will carry all the interests of the population. Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin led the USSR for many years and the country saw a significant increase in literacy, manufacture, and scientific discovery. The people were much more prosperous and united in it. This occurred very quickly, so the efficient quality of the communist party is clear and recorded in history.
In conclusion, the Communist Party is the greatest political system at providing its people happiness. People are more likely to be fulfilled because crime and bureaucracy is not getting in the way of their work. It is likely to be scientific work, which is favored by some over traditional labor in agriculture or industrial manufacture. So why not be a communist? Some find their unequal level ownership of items, compared the ownership of lesser items by others, to provide more happiness. However, this is ultimately not true, and also ultimately undesirable due to its effect on the environment, because it is a result of the social conditioning Western capitalism's attitudes has had on its people. In the 21st century many have found satisfaction instead through the sciences and the arts, being rewarded with worldwide fame for their discovery, design, or creation. Be a communist, the communist party wants you to join.
Friday, May 22, 2015
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
About Degenerate People in Contemporary Education and Politics
Are the degenerate people of society becoming leaders in contemporary education and politics? And are they negatively affecting the U.S. population?
My thesis is that, yes, the degenerate people of society are becoming leaders in contemporary education and politics. Specifically, hip-hop, underground, and alternative cultures need to be put aside so that scientific, academic, and Christian-like thinking works better in society. To accomplish this, the funding of the poor should be removed, their social support removed (e.g., less rap, hip-hop, love songs etc. on television shows, advertisements, and movies). Possibly make voluntary and health-related euthanasia legally OK in a professional way. In my judgment, the degenerate should be removed from society so that they do not become leaders in contemporary education and politics and thereby negatively affect the U.S. population.
John Doe is a teacher who got his teaching credential at Stanford University. I was in his A.P. U.S. History class. In about fall 2008 John Doe argued that hip-hop music is OK at a public high school. He particularly gave us a work-sheet outlining how to write an essay. I thought the idea of a teacher thinking hip-hop music is acceptable in the classroom was odd.
The teacher argued that hip-hop expresses what it is like to be a poor person in the city. It follows that the music is normal because it helps the listener feel good, like classical music and traditional art. However, it does not help because it is dancing music and not quiet music. It does not help develop the mind and it is not useful for doing scientific work. Scientific work is what helps make the society do well. Therefore, hip-hop only makes society degenerate. So it shouldn't be allowed in the class-room and the teacher shouldn't talk about it.
Barack Obama is the current president of the United States. I first heard of him in high-school. I thought he was OK. I only thought he was OK because I thought Democrat politics helps poor people get better. Later when I was able to vote I voted for him because I thought he would continue to help poor people get better. I hadn't written about the ideas but did later read some polemics that my A.P. World History teacher suggested I read.
In retrospect Barack Obama's policies have a negligible effect on the U.S. population.
The president was cheered for in my classrooms at my high school in 2008. Later, I heard about him in urban neighborhoods being cheered for as well. There is a rap artist who follows him closely and copies him closely. Obama is famous among the black and they like him a lot, though their comments are contradictory. So he has black appeal. If Barack Obama has "black appeal" then politics is not doing well. Firstly, he goes on the radio and on television and tries to get more people to his side. He also sings love songs at traditional political dinners. Secondly, he claims to be Christian but the secular art and culture goes through more and has a greater effect.
Historically, it was the social unity through Christianity that allowed capitalism and democracy to work, in the transition from agriculture and monarchism to industry and new government. But, we see in the United States that this does not really work. There is much crime and people are being put in prison because of the law enforcement. I think this is a waste of resources. The criminals were not integrated well into the social system. At the point of prison they are worthless and leaving the facilities they do negligible work. So they should be euthanized.
In politics it is argued to how to decrease nuclear weapons in other countries and to improve health-care quality. Generally, either influence other countries or to attempt to help the poor. However, it is not argued how to make the country wealthier or better in itself - apart from others. So the country should be isolated and then social degeneracy like mainstream music, films, and non-scientific, non-academic, non-Christian culture put aside -- certainly not taught in public high schools. Therefore, the degenerate should be removed from contemporary education and politics by the means of cutting their funding and social support.
Jane Doe is a recent UC Berkeley graduate who now teaches at a public charter middle school. She majored in Spanish and Portugese Literature. She did poorly at UC Berkeley, writing many e-mails to teachers about having her being kept at the school. I suggested that she become a writer, not a teacher. She did it as backfall. The teacher, originally intending to study mathematics. I find that many street-like people, unhealthy, and taking their work lightly are going into leadership positions. There is also, an obese black woman from a program that worked at the high school I attended. She was obese and dressed like a street person as well.
If new public leaders are unhealthy, think the poor are OK; then technology is not being used well. If technology is not being used well then the people who do not use it well need to be removed. Their funding needs to be cut. I would not like to see more mainstream, hip-hop culture because it does not result in good scientific thinking, I would not like to see more "black appeal" in politics because it does not result in an advanced society, and I would not like to see technology being used badly. I don't want to these items in existence because they do not lead to a better society that wouldn't negatively affect my work. They do not help the environment in a positive way. So, degenerate people in contemporary education and politics should be removed by cutting their social support in society.
My thesis is that, yes, the degenerate people of society are becoming leaders in contemporary education and politics. Specifically, hip-hop, underground, and alternative cultures need to be put aside so that scientific, academic, and Christian-like thinking works better in society. To accomplish this, the funding of the poor should be removed, their social support removed (e.g., less rap, hip-hop, love songs etc. on television shows, advertisements, and movies). Possibly make voluntary and health-related euthanasia legally OK in a professional way. In my judgment, the degenerate should be removed from society so that they do not become leaders in contemporary education and politics and thereby negatively affect the U.S. population.
John Doe is a teacher who got his teaching credential at Stanford University. I was in his A.P. U.S. History class. In about fall 2008 John Doe argued that hip-hop music is OK at a public high school. He particularly gave us a work-sheet outlining how to write an essay. I thought the idea of a teacher thinking hip-hop music is acceptable in the classroom was odd.
The teacher argued that hip-hop expresses what it is like to be a poor person in the city. It follows that the music is normal because it helps the listener feel good, like classical music and traditional art. However, it does not help because it is dancing music and not quiet music. It does not help develop the mind and it is not useful for doing scientific work. Scientific work is what helps make the society do well. Therefore, hip-hop only makes society degenerate. So it shouldn't be allowed in the class-room and the teacher shouldn't talk about it.
Barack Obama is the current president of the United States. I first heard of him in high-school. I thought he was OK. I only thought he was OK because I thought Democrat politics helps poor people get better. Later when I was able to vote I voted for him because I thought he would continue to help poor people get better. I hadn't written about the ideas but did later read some polemics that my A.P. World History teacher suggested I read.
In retrospect Barack Obama's policies have a negligible effect on the U.S. population.
The president was cheered for in my classrooms at my high school in 2008. Later, I heard about him in urban neighborhoods being cheered for as well. There is a rap artist who follows him closely and copies him closely. Obama is famous among the black and they like him a lot, though their comments are contradictory. So he has black appeal. If Barack Obama has "black appeal" then politics is not doing well. Firstly, he goes on the radio and on television and tries to get more people to his side. He also sings love songs at traditional political dinners. Secondly, he claims to be Christian but the secular art and culture goes through more and has a greater effect.
Historically, it was the social unity through Christianity that allowed capitalism and democracy to work, in the transition from agriculture and monarchism to industry and new government. But, we see in the United States that this does not really work. There is much crime and people are being put in prison because of the law enforcement. I think this is a waste of resources. The criminals were not integrated well into the social system. At the point of prison they are worthless and leaving the facilities they do negligible work. So they should be euthanized.
In politics it is argued to how to decrease nuclear weapons in other countries and to improve health-care quality. Generally, either influence other countries or to attempt to help the poor. However, it is not argued how to make the country wealthier or better in itself - apart from others. So the country should be isolated and then social degeneracy like mainstream music, films, and non-scientific, non-academic, non-Christian culture put aside -- certainly not taught in public high schools. Therefore, the degenerate should be removed from contemporary education and politics by the means of cutting their funding and social support.
Jane Doe is a recent UC Berkeley graduate who now teaches at a public charter middle school. She majored in Spanish and Portugese Literature. She did poorly at UC Berkeley, writing many e-mails to teachers about having her being kept at the school. I suggested that she become a writer, not a teacher. She did it as backfall. The teacher, originally intending to study mathematics. I find that many street-like people, unhealthy, and taking their work lightly are going into leadership positions. There is also, an obese black woman from a program that worked at the high school I attended. She was obese and dressed like a street person as well.
If new public leaders are unhealthy, think the poor are OK; then technology is not being used well. If technology is not being used well then the people who do not use it well need to be removed. Their funding needs to be cut. I would not like to see more mainstream, hip-hop culture because it does not result in good scientific thinking, I would not like to see more "black appeal" in politics because it does not result in an advanced society, and I would not like to see technology being used badly. I don't want to these items in existence because they do not lead to a better society that wouldn't negatively affect my work. They do not help the environment in a positive way. So, degenerate people in contemporary education and politics should be removed by cutting their social support in society.
Sunday, April 12, 2015
A note about Barack Obama's policies and its negligible effect on the U.S. population
President Barack Obama's policies had a negligible positive effect on the U.S. population. It was a waste of resources really because if he was to spend the money given to run the administration on other items then there would be a greater positive effect on the U.S. population. So the policies were a negative unit, including his administration. Certainly not a positive change.
Firstly, the LGBT issues are not as important as the social degeneracy occurring in the United States. If people spend their time using technology for inferior activities then the society will break down. Some gay guys get into trouble but really bullying is a part of a greater problem in which students, workers, and employees are not getting along well. The problem of social degeneracy.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/158066/special-report-adults-identify-lgbt.aspx
There aren't as many gay people, or "LGBT" people as other people. So their problems are not as important as the problems of poverty. However, even if there is poverty people can get along well. Recently, on the news Barack Obama claimed that gay conversion therapy isn't good for youths. I agree. However, it is not as important as saying, we should get along well and respect each other more in order to decrease the amount of social degeneracy that results in crime, bullying, and disrespect. Bullying and disrespect are crimes themselves in many places. I think that the LGBT community has too much acceptance and diversity and acceptance atmospheres are becoming to prevalent because there are parties on the street in the bay area celebrating the choice of sex. I think it's unimportant.
If people do not get along in the workplace or on the streets then the services we provide to each other do not work well.
Secondly, health-care is not as important as the practice of science in the United States. If people spend less time eating bad foods, instead eating vegetables, then they will have more time to study a science or take up a scientific endeavor such as physics, math, or computer science. Obese people spend their time at the hospital waiting for diabetes medication but they could have eaten vegetable foods instead and studied chemistry to synthesize better food. Medicine can become more accurate as well.
If people think better in the workplace or on the streets by eating better, e.g. vegetable foods drinking water, etc. and by having studied or in the process of studying a hard science such as chemistry or physics then their minds are better at solving problems and less prone to making bad decisions. Physical exercise is good too. I'm one of the few people I see on the street running in the morning.
Thirdly, social mobility is not as important as the practice of removing social degeneracy in the United States. I think that people will always have more money, in the sense that there will always be an attempt to make a greater concentration of money at the top of a pyramidal-like structure in the United States. So to try to make it easier for others to do so is sort of futile because it only contributes to a greater tension that will result in bad protests. The protests haven't solved the problem of poverty. Liberal-democracy only really works if the people are Christian or think alike. However, in the United States the people do not think alike. Generally, they do not think with a belief so they end up fighting each other. In this scramble, the bad guy usually wins because as we see, Barack Obama, who has top influence right now just uses it for negligible work and a nice picture. Both protesting and government work doesn't do much. I think that people are supposed to form a party more important than the Democrat and than the Republican Party, The Communist Party.
Recently it seems that criminals and street people were combined into the Security Enforcement patrol. The CIA, possibly. I think I heard some birds' singing being overlayed with street gang noise.
I think that instead of people making worthless noise they should form a party to isolate the country so that it can focus on domestic policies and solve the problems social degeneracy, lack of scientific thinking, and abundance of pollution.
Firstly, the LGBT issues are not as important as the social degeneracy occurring in the United States. If people spend their time using technology for inferior activities then the society will break down. Some gay guys get into trouble but really bullying is a part of a greater problem in which students, workers, and employees are not getting along well. The problem of social degeneracy.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/158066/special-report-adults-identify-lgbt.aspx
There aren't as many gay people, or "LGBT" people as other people. So their problems are not as important as the problems of poverty. However, even if there is poverty people can get along well. Recently, on the news Barack Obama claimed that gay conversion therapy isn't good for youths. I agree. However, it is not as important as saying, we should get along well and respect each other more in order to decrease the amount of social degeneracy that results in crime, bullying, and disrespect. Bullying and disrespect are crimes themselves in many places. I think that the LGBT community has too much acceptance and diversity and acceptance atmospheres are becoming to prevalent because there are parties on the street in the bay area celebrating the choice of sex. I think it's unimportant.
If people do not get along in the workplace or on the streets then the services we provide to each other do not work well.
Secondly, health-care is not as important as the practice of science in the United States. If people spend less time eating bad foods, instead eating vegetables, then they will have more time to study a science or take up a scientific endeavor such as physics, math, or computer science. Obese people spend their time at the hospital waiting for diabetes medication but they could have eaten vegetable foods instead and studied chemistry to synthesize better food. Medicine can become more accurate as well.
If people think better in the workplace or on the streets by eating better, e.g. vegetable foods drinking water, etc. and by having studied or in the process of studying a hard science such as chemistry or physics then their minds are better at solving problems and less prone to making bad decisions. Physical exercise is good too. I'm one of the few people I see on the street running in the morning.
Thirdly, social mobility is not as important as the practice of removing social degeneracy in the United States. I think that people will always have more money, in the sense that there will always be an attempt to make a greater concentration of money at the top of a pyramidal-like structure in the United States. So to try to make it easier for others to do so is sort of futile because it only contributes to a greater tension that will result in bad protests. The protests haven't solved the problem of poverty. Liberal-democracy only really works if the people are Christian or think alike. However, in the United States the people do not think alike. Generally, they do not think with a belief so they end up fighting each other. In this scramble, the bad guy usually wins because as we see, Barack Obama, who has top influence right now just uses it for negligible work and a nice picture. Both protesting and government work doesn't do much. I think that people are supposed to form a party more important than the Democrat and than the Republican Party, The Communist Party.
Recently it seems that criminals and street people were combined into the Security Enforcement patrol. The CIA, possibly. I think I heard some birds' singing being overlayed with street gang noise.
I think that instead of people making worthless noise they should form a party to isolate the country so that it can focus on domestic policies and solve the problems social degeneracy, lack of scientific thinking, and abundance of pollution.
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
The British Empire and The USSR
Did the British empire promise its colonial subjects a beneficial outcome regarding the quality of the society? Does this thereby prove that the USSR was an imperial power as well during the same time?
My thesis is that the British empire did not promise its colonial subjects a beneficial outcome, but did make things easier for themselves. The items that enabled the British empire to work better unintentionally helped the Africans. Though the aid and its effect was unsignificant, as seen today. In contrast, the promises in the musical compositions sung by laborers in the West about the time of revolution were realized and were evident, concrete. Therefore, the USSR was not an imperial power. It was a legitimate Communist government.
The compositions that are the White Man's burden are the examples that the European imperialism was setting to Africa and other colonies.
They show a man washing hands. They say, "[the natives] are captured and are half-devils." If they are trying to teach the subjects cleanliness and the idea that they are enslaved and are partially bad, then they are asserting a superiority. If the superiority asserted by the British imperialism made the natives look bad then the imperialism did not suggest a better outcome for the natives. So the intention was to extract resources. The superior infrastructure we see today is negligible because it is weak and was only introductory then, needed for the work of the empire. Therefore, the British empire did not create a better country for the Africans.
Therefore, its outcome; AIDS, tribal warfare, terrorist origins etc. , is not indicative of a promise.
In contrast, the USSR immediately saw an increase in the literacy of the population and a decrease in crime - with many being sent to the gulag, a massive prison in Russia's territory. Leisure time also increased, so there were more easy activities to do. Therefore, health was better. There, was in the 1960s a type of health-care, therefore the quality of life was superior. At its beginning, as known in labor songs such as the Internationale and the anthem of the USSR itself, unity in the work-place, freedom from arbitrary bosses and an increase in prosperity were idealized and sung about. Therefore, the intent was clear to make a better society. It was later evident that the items were realized and seen. Therefore, the USSR was not an imperial power. Therefore, the USSR was a legitimate Socialist country.
My thesis is that the British empire did not promise its colonial subjects a beneficial outcome, but did make things easier for themselves. The items that enabled the British empire to work better unintentionally helped the Africans. Though the aid and its effect was unsignificant, as seen today. In contrast, the promises in the musical compositions sung by laborers in the West about the time of revolution were realized and were evident, concrete. Therefore, the USSR was not an imperial power. It was a legitimate Communist government.
The compositions that are the White Man's burden are the examples that the European imperialism was setting to Africa and other colonies.
They show a man washing hands. They say, "[the natives] are captured and are half-devils." If they are trying to teach the subjects cleanliness and the idea that they are enslaved and are partially bad, then they are asserting a superiority. If the superiority asserted by the British imperialism made the natives look bad then the imperialism did not suggest a better outcome for the natives. So the intention was to extract resources. The superior infrastructure we see today is negligible because it is weak and was only introductory then, needed for the work of the empire. Therefore, the British empire did not create a better country for the Africans.
Therefore, its outcome; AIDS, tribal warfare, terrorist origins etc. , is not indicative of a promise.
In contrast, the USSR immediately saw an increase in the literacy of the population and a decrease in crime - with many being sent to the gulag, a massive prison in Russia's territory. Leisure time also increased, so there were more easy activities to do. Therefore, health was better. There, was in the 1960s a type of health-care, therefore the quality of life was superior. At its beginning, as known in labor songs such as the Internationale and the anthem of the USSR itself, unity in the work-place, freedom from arbitrary bosses and an increase in prosperity were idealized and sung about. Therefore, the intent was clear to make a better society. It was later evident that the items were realized and seen. Therefore, the USSR was not an imperial power. Therefore, the USSR was a legitimate Socialist country.
Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Sunday, April 5, 2015
The Closet by Victor Mazariegos
I turn around to see my reflection in the mirror. The mirror is new, shines brightly at the edges; it has a silver-gold plated border, and I look good in it. I feel good about myself. The lights in the room are on, the computer is on (a slim black pc-laptop). The computer has its desktop set to a picture of a forest and a stream. In the picture is me, standing alone in a white t-shirt with a design and I'm wearing blue shorts. The stream is a rich blue and the trees in the background are colorfully green and the stems are a dark brown. I go to google maps and set my path. Erik Satie plays in the background on the eletronic music player. I print it. Next, I shower, put my clothes on, and take my backpack. I leave. On the way up the hill from my parents' apartment I breathe heavily and listen to Erik Satie. Gnossienne No. 3 plays through the white ear buds. The night starts. It was about 7: 30 pm when I left my parents' apartment. It was slightly dark already. It's 9 pm now. My parents think I'm going to my friends house to play music. I'm not. I'm going to meet another young man at a park that is up the street from my house. We might hike the dirt paths there.
"Hello," I say to the young adult in a UC Berkeley t-shirt. "Hi," he says, "Why do you study mathematics?" he asks. I say, "Because it's interesting." We met through craigslist. We do talk much, we share a conversation about classical music. He says he started playing piano at age 8. I started playing piano at the same age. We both grew up in the San Francisco bay area. Him in the hills of Berkeley, me in the hills of Oakland. I ride my bike a lot, I tell him. We're very much alike, he also likes to ride his bike. We're both slim and wear our hair short. He is white, I am latino, white as well. "Why do you study American history?" I ask, and add, "I find it very straightforward, mostly essay writing." He says, "It's fun, I plan to teach it later." The reason I met him is because I don't have many friends, I have a few that I talk to at school but we study most of the time and I finish early so I went on a walk this evening, this weekened. I look down at my black Nike shoes and think of my girlfriend. I wonder what she's doing tonight. I think of a funny youtube video. It's the one about where a group of youths prank an old man and the old man says, "fuck you," and the youths say "fuck you too." It went viral. He makes a comment.
I take out my knife. I stab him in the head. Blood pours out, but I can't really see it. I stab him again, in the face. He cries. He didn't suspect it. He dies painfully, twitching, not making much noise. Blood gets on his shirt and I take out my iPhone and shine the light from my iPhone on his white shirt. I let him die on the dark tree path and he dies and rots there. Two nights later his death is on the news. I don't know why I do it. It feels good. It's OK. It makes me feel OK. Happy, I go back down the hill with my knife in my black packpack. I look in the mirror, the new mirror. It looks cool. I look good. I have my hair parted to the side my hair looks black but really it's brown and it shines from olive oil. My parents ask me if I want dinner, this is the Saturday following the Friday I killed the other young man. I say no and I go to my closet. I open it and there I see a corpse and it's bloody and it's red and I laugh. The next weekend, I go ride my bicycle a black road bicycle, a Fuji - City Bike. It's black and the paint always looks new. That day I rode my bicycle I go to my closet and I look and it's the guy I killed. His corpse is bloody and red and I laugh.
I turn around to see my reflection in the mirror. The mirror is new, shines brightly at the edges; it has a silver-gold plated border, and I look good in it. I feel good about myself. The lights in the room are on, the computer is on (a slim black pc-laptop). The computer has its desktop set to a picture of a forest and a stream. In the picture is me, standing alone in a white t-shirt with a design and I'm wearing blue shorts. The stream is a rich blue and the trees in the background are colorfully green and the stems are a dark brown. I go to google maps and set my path. Erik Satie plays in the background on the eletronic music player. I print it. Next, I shower, put my clothes on, and take my backpack. I leave. On the way up the hill from my parents' apartment I breathe heavily and listen to Erik Satie. Gnossienne No. 3 plays through the white ear buds. The night starts. It was about 7: 30 pm when I left my parents' apartment. It was slightly dark already. It's 9 pm now. My parents think I'm going to my friends house to play music. I'm not. I'm going to meet another young man at a park that is up the street from my house. We might hike the dirt paths there.
"Hello," I say to the young adult in a UC Berkeley t-shirt. "Hi," he says, "Why do you study mathematics?" he asks. I say, "Because it's interesting." We met through craigslist. We do talk much, we share a conversation about classical music. He says he started playing piano at age 8. I started playing piano at the same age. We both grew up in the San Francisco bay area. Him in the hills of Berkeley, me in the hills of Oakland. I ride my bike a lot, I tell him. We're very much alike, he also likes to ride his bike. We're both slim and wear our hair short. He is white, I am latino, white as well. "Why do you study American history?" I ask, and add, "I find it very straightforward, mostly essay writing." He says, "It's fun, I plan to teach it later." The reason I met him is because I don't have many friends, I have a few that I talk to at school but we study most of the time and I finish early so I went on a walk this evening, this weekened. I look down at my black Nike shoes and think of my girlfriend. I wonder what she's doing tonight. I think of a funny youtube video. It's the one about where a group of youths prank an old man and the old man says, "fuck you," and the youths say "fuck you too." It went viral. He makes a comment.
I take out my knife. I stab him in the head. Blood pours out, but I can't really see it. I stab him again, in the face. He cries. He didn't suspect it. He dies painfully, twitching, not making much noise. Blood gets on his shirt and I take out my iPhone and shine the light from my iPhone on his white shirt. I let him die on the dark tree path and he dies and rots there. Two nights later his death is on the news. I don't know why I do it. It feels good. It's OK. It makes me feel OK. Happy, I go back down the hill with my knife in my black packpack. I look in the mirror, the new mirror. It looks cool. I look good. I have my hair parted to the side my hair looks black but really it's brown and it shines from olive oil. My parents ask me if I want dinner, this is the Saturday following the Friday I killed the other young man. I say no and I go to my closet. I open it and there I see a corpse and it's bloody and it's red and I laugh. The next weekend, I go ride my bicycle a black road bicycle, a Fuji - City Bike. It's black and the paint always looks new. That day I rode my bicycle I go to my closet and I look and it's the guy I killed. His corpse is bloody and red and I laugh.
Sunday, March 22, 2015
Friday, March 13, 2015
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
Venezuela oil and US interest on the news recently (2015)
http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?t=0&v=97&l=en
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/03/obama-declares-venezuela-national-security-threat-150309164808710.html
“US President Barack Obama has issued an executive order declaring Venezuela a national security threat, and slapped sanctions on seven officials.
According to a White House statement issued on Monday, the new set of targeted sanctions excludes the Venezuelan people and any trade relations with the oil-rich nation and are instead specifically aimed at government officials the US accuses of violating human rights.
"Venezuelan officials past and present who violate the human rights of Venezuelan citizens and engage in acts of public corruption will not be welcome here, and we now have the tools to block their assets and their use of US financial systems," White House spokesman Josh Earnest said in the statement.
"We are deeply concerned by the Venezuelan government's efforts to escalate intimidation of its political opponents. Venezuela's problems cannot be solved by criminalising dissent," the statement said.”
If Barack Obama has given sanctions to seven Venezuelan officials then the government of the US is wrong. My first reason for arguing this is that they used the word “slap” and “slapped,” as if the Venezuelan officials and also the Venezuelans are some sort of subordinate person to the US government. Therefore, they are disrespectful. If the US government is disrespectful then it does not have good moral practice. If the US does not have good moral practice then it should not lead the world, especially countries with more resources than them. If the US should not lead the world, then it should lessen its complaints against others.
If the US accuses of violating human rights then it is being hypocritical. The government of the US tortured many in the middle east in the attempt to establish liberal democracy there, particularly in the replacement of the Islamist socialist totalitarian government of Saddam Hussein. Also, historically, it has tortured many others and invaded and taken what is not theirs. For example, in Guatemala the US government ordered the end of the Communist revolution that was about to occur. Today, still there are many poor - which would have been prevented by Guatemalans’ having more independence over their resources and infrastructure - for example, the electricity generators and the fruit companies, especially the land. If still there are many poor in an area that the US government tried to stop then the US government should not act in the area any more. Therefore, it failed. Therefore, because its world mission is to spread liberal democracy, which is an ideology of creating prosperity - then it is hypocritical. Therefore, they shouldn’t interfere with human rights violations.
Venezuela has one of the largest reserves of oil in the world. It should keep it and possibly share it with the other latino countries.
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/03/obama-declares-venezuela-national-security-threat-150309164808710.html
“US President Barack Obama has issued an executive order declaring Venezuela a national security threat, and slapped sanctions on seven officials.
According to a White House statement issued on Monday, the new set of targeted sanctions excludes the Venezuelan people and any trade relations with the oil-rich nation and are instead specifically aimed at government officials the US accuses of violating human rights.
"Venezuelan officials past and present who violate the human rights of Venezuelan citizens and engage in acts of public corruption will not be welcome here, and we now have the tools to block their assets and their use of US financial systems," White House spokesman Josh Earnest said in the statement.
"We are deeply concerned by the Venezuelan government's efforts to escalate intimidation of its political opponents. Venezuela's problems cannot be solved by criminalising dissent," the statement said.”
If Barack Obama has given sanctions to seven Venezuelan officials then the government of the US is wrong. My first reason for arguing this is that they used the word “slap” and “slapped,” as if the Venezuelan officials and also the Venezuelans are some sort of subordinate person to the US government. Therefore, they are disrespectful. If the US government is disrespectful then it does not have good moral practice. If the US does not have good moral practice then it should not lead the world, especially countries with more resources than them. If the US should not lead the world, then it should lessen its complaints against others.
If the US accuses of violating human rights then it is being hypocritical. The government of the US tortured many in the middle east in the attempt to establish liberal democracy there, particularly in the replacement of the Islamist socialist totalitarian government of Saddam Hussein. Also, historically, it has tortured many others and invaded and taken what is not theirs. For example, in Guatemala the US government ordered the end of the Communist revolution that was about to occur. Today, still there are many poor - which would have been prevented by Guatemalans’ having more independence over their resources and infrastructure - for example, the electricity generators and the fruit companies, especially the land. If still there are many poor in an area that the US government tried to stop then the US government should not act in the area any more. Therefore, it failed. Therefore, because its world mission is to spread liberal democracy, which is an ideology of creating prosperity - then it is hypocritical. Therefore, they shouldn’t interfere with human rights violations.
Venezuela has one of the largest reserves of oil in the world. It should keep it and possibly share it with the other latino countries.
Monday, March 9, 2015
A comment/analysis of the protest in Wisconsin about black man Tony Robinson Jr.'s death
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-31801192
“Protestors in Wisconsin took to the streets for a third day over the shooting of an unarmed black teenager by a white police officer.
More than 100 people marched to the state's Capitol in Madison on Sunday, beating drums and holding placards.
Nineteen-year-old Tony Robinson Jr was shot on Friday evening in an apartment. He was unarmed, but police say he attacked the officer who shot him.”
If protesters in Wisconsin are taking to the street shooting of an unarmed black teenager then according to the community the police did something wrong. If according to the community the police did something wrong there then both groups should be questioned. If both groups should be questioned then both groups lack credibility. If both groups lack credibility then the one with most education should be trusted. If the one with most education should be trusted then it is the police. If the police have traditionally been informed longer with reference to the law then the police should be trusted. Therefore, the case conclusion is to be in favor of the police side.
‘More than 100 people marched to the state’s Capitol’ so there is a great effect. The people there are beating drums and holding placards. If they are beating drums and holding placards then they are making a lot of noise and trying to send messages. If they are making a lot of noise and trying to send messages then they are trying to establish something. If they are trying to establish something then they are doing it through noise and traditional means. However, traditional means will not work. They are trying to send a message by holding signs. The message is obsolete. Recently, the Occupy Wall-street protests were a failure. Therefore, so are these protests. Furthermore, if they are attempting to do a protest they are only making sound. Therefore, their goals have failed already. Compared to the police, who are only doing their job by ending a loud protest; the protesters may have made noise over an untrue point.
Tony Robinson Jr. attacked the officer who went into his apartment. Therefore, Tony Robinson Jr. was wrong. If the police officers were allowed to go in then Tony Robinson Jr. only had to let them do their work. If Tony Robinson Jr. only had to let them do their work then he made a mistake. If Tony Robinson Jr. made a mistake then he was wrong. If Robinson Jr. was wrong then because Tony Robinson Jr. had made armed robberies, as the article shows, then he deserved to die. If he deserved to die then the protests are void.
In my judgment, if a person takes another’s items by force then the person deserves death. Therefore, the protests are void and Tony Robinson’s Jr.’s death is unimportant.
“Protestors in Wisconsin took to the streets for a third day over the shooting of an unarmed black teenager by a white police officer.
More than 100 people marched to the state's Capitol in Madison on Sunday, beating drums and holding placards.
Nineteen-year-old Tony Robinson Jr was shot on Friday evening in an apartment. He was unarmed, but police say he attacked the officer who shot him.”
If protesters in Wisconsin are taking to the street shooting of an unarmed black teenager then according to the community the police did something wrong. If according to the community the police did something wrong there then both groups should be questioned. If both groups should be questioned then both groups lack credibility. If both groups lack credibility then the one with most education should be trusted. If the one with most education should be trusted then it is the police. If the police have traditionally been informed longer with reference to the law then the police should be trusted. Therefore, the case conclusion is to be in favor of the police side.
‘More than 100 people marched to the state’s Capitol’ so there is a great effect. The people there are beating drums and holding placards. If they are beating drums and holding placards then they are making a lot of noise and trying to send messages. If they are making a lot of noise and trying to send messages then they are trying to establish something. If they are trying to establish something then they are doing it through noise and traditional means. However, traditional means will not work. They are trying to send a message by holding signs. The message is obsolete. Recently, the Occupy Wall-street protests were a failure. Therefore, so are these protests. Furthermore, if they are attempting to do a protest they are only making sound. Therefore, their goals have failed already. Compared to the police, who are only doing their job by ending a loud protest; the protesters may have made noise over an untrue point.
Tony Robinson Jr. attacked the officer who went into his apartment. Therefore, Tony Robinson Jr. was wrong. If the police officers were allowed to go in then Tony Robinson Jr. only had to let them do their work. If Tony Robinson Jr. only had to let them do their work then he made a mistake. If Tony Robinson Jr. made a mistake then he was wrong. If Robinson Jr. was wrong then because Tony Robinson Jr. had made armed robberies, as the article shows, then he deserved to die. If he deserved to die then the protests are void.
In my judgment, if a person takes another’s items by force then the person deserves death. Therefore, the protests are void and Tony Robinson’s Jr.’s death is unimportant.
Saturday, March 7, 2015
Four points about Christianity, Liberal democracy, and Social Mobility
1. “Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over th birds o the air, and over the cattle, over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth. So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female created them.”
If men are made in the image of God then men should be good. According to Christianity, God is good.
2. From The End of History and the Last Man by Francis Fukuyama Page 143.
“What is at stake for people around the world, from Spain and Argentina to Hungary and Poland, when they throw off dictatorship and establish liberal democracy? To some extent, the answer is a purely negative one based on the mistakes and injustices of the preceding political order; they want to get rid of the hated colonels or party bosses who oppressed them, or to live without fear of arbitrary arrest.”
If what is at stake during transition from dictatorship to liberal democracy is oppression and freedom from arbitrary arrest then liberal democracy is good. If liberal democracy is good then it is like Christianity. Therefore, according to the political theory, men of liberal democracy are good. Therefore, it is superior. Therefore, it should exist.
3. The End of History and The Last Man by Francis Fukuyama Page 199.
“For Hegel, the French Revolution was the event that took the Christian vision of a free and equal society, and implemented it here on earth. In making this revolution the former slaves risked their lives, and in doing so proved that they had overcome the very fear of death that had served originally to define them as slaves. The principles of liberty and equality were then carried to the rest of Europe by Napoleon’s victorious armies.”
If the French Revolution was the event that took the Christian vision of a free and equal society, that is, if it made a “utopia” on earth, then it is perfect. If liberal democracy and capitalism are perfect then there should be no suffering. However, there is, therefore, it is not perfect. Therefore, the Christian vision of a free and equal society does not exist on earth. If in making this revolution the former slaves risked their lives then there were slaves. If there were slaves then in liberal democracy and capitalism they are no longer slaves. However, there is suffering, for example crime and psychological torture, therefore there is still slavery. So, the result was no change. Therefore, the men of liberal democracy are not good. Therefore, they do not deserve to exist.
4. With reference to social mobility and degeneracy, because liberal democracy was originally not very moral and prone to corruption then social mobility will only result in more degeneracy. However, this will not necessarily result in a revolution because if people who commit crimes get into power, like Barack Obama, then there will be only more corruption. The corruption is legitimate because it is allowed by law or is the law, and The Communist Party is banned. Therefore, only rightness will come about by the unban of The Communist Party or by another group externally forming it here. Barack Obama and his group, his employees etc. are not good people and their lives are in contradiction with what their society was supposed to be. They are failures. Therefore, they do not deserve to exist.
Sunday, March 1, 2015
Saturday, February 28, 2015
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Monday, February 23, 2015
Saturday, February 21, 2015
Friday, February 20, 2015
Progress in easy class. From two weeks ago.
I can't post much besides this. I have to sleep. I have to keep talk about my math/school stuff at a minimal level.
Political Science, Psychology, and Social Welfare etc. are obsolete
Political Science, Psychology, and Social Welfare etc. are obsolete
The model Pure Communist Citizen (I am certainly a pure communist but I am only in year 2 of college, presently)
- He or she is a physicist or mathematician, & etc.
- Is polite and is not rude
- Is in a single-couple relationship only.
- Is well-dressed (clothes is non-colorful, and fits body size well)
- Is healthy and does not smoke or drink beer; doesn't do drugs etc.
- Is knowledgeable about politics, particularly American history, world history, and philosophies
- Is generally clean
- Listens to classical music
- Is certainly not black, i.e. of African descent. Skin is not black. (Race part by Sean Gallagher.)
- Certainly agrees with Pure Communist philosophies.
Be like these guys (Scientists.):
Niels Bohr, physicist
Ernest Rutherford, physicist
Erwin Shrodinger, physicist
David Hilbert, mathematician
John Von Neumann, mathematician
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
Monday, February 16, 2015
Sunday, February 8, 2015
I wrote this article and posted it here, I put it back up because I noticed that blacks are trying to target me again.
Victor Mazariegos
December 13, 2014
About Ray Sanchez’ “Protesting police shootings: demanding for change sound out nationwide”
"Sound." If protesting
police shootings is of sound then the behavior of reformist individuals
are not good for their ends. They have not studied, they have not made
much, they have not done well to solve their problems. Sound implies
talk only. For many decades, these people have made protests in favor of
their ends for the purpose of making change but they have not formed a
concrete party. Therefore, their demands are made seem petty.
With reference to “nationwide,” their effect is not good in aggregate.
"Invoking the familiar
names of black men who died at the hands of police, thousands marched
throughout the nation on Saturday to protest what they see as rampant
racial injustice."
"Familiar." If the protests are of "familiar," then family is
implied. A group of black men died at the hands of police, they protest
what they see as rampant racial injustice - but in doing so they make a
rampage as well. "Protest." If a protest is made then it is ultimately
pointless. It makes them feel good but that is only temporary and really
the problem is not racial unity.
"The throngs — young and old, black and white — took to the
streets in major cities, including New York. In Washington, a crowd of
thousands snaked up Pennsylvania Avenue to the Capitol.”
"Black and white," "young and old." Both groups of them do
not seem to be scientists. I have not read of many scientists that
protest the shootings. So their claims are less credible than those
argued by scientists. If their claims are less credible than those
argued by scientists then the protests are less worthy.
"Relatives of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Tamir Rice, Eric
Garner and other unarmed black men felled by bullets or police force
filled a podium in Washington."
”Unarmed.” If people that are unarmed are getting hurt then
they were wrong. If they were wrong then they do not deserve that much
respect. If they do not deserve much respect then they should likely be
executed. If it is likely that they should be executed then their
problems aren’t important.
"This is a history-making moment," said Gwen Carr, whose son,
Eric Garner, died after a police officer put him in a chokehold. "It’s
just so overwhelming to see all who have come to stand with us. Look at
the masses — black, white, all races, all religions. … We need to stand
like this at all times."
“Stand.” These people came to Washington to stand. If they
went to Washington to stand then they wasted their time. If they wasted
their time then their efforts are not as important as others. If their
efforts are not as important as others then they are not very great. It
does not seem like a history-making moment. Therefore, I do not care
about their efforts.
“Lesley McSpadden, the mother of Michael Brown, a teenager
killed in Ferguson, Missouri, marveled at the crowds.”What a sea of
people,” she said. “If they don’t see this and
make a change, then I don’t know what we got to do.”Kadiatou
Diallo, whose son Amadou was shot 41 times by four New York police
officers in 1999, held up a Time magazine cover about her son’s slaying.
The officers were prosecuted on second-degree murder and other charges
but were acquitted by a jury.”
“Shot 41 times.” “Magazine cover about her son’s slaying.” If
her son got shot 41 times and her mother is holding up a “time
magazine” cover then they are very weak. Their attempts to argue for
their movement is not good. If their attempts to argue for their
movement is not good then it is likely that they will not go through.
They want less racial
tensions. There do not seem to be many racial tensions actually. There
is interracial marrying, there is interracial groupings, on television
and on the street and the president of the US is black. Therefore, there
isn’t much racial tensions. They are arguing for pointless ends.
"Today, 15 year later, we are standing together and demanding
the same thing," she said of police brutality. "Think about that for a
moment. Think about all the young men taken from us."
“Think.” It seems that
many of these people do not think. There aren’t many scientists arguing
for the case of these guys. If many of these people do not think then
they are not good. If they are not good then they do not deserve to be
as alive.
If they would like to
have their attempts to make better lives for themselves then they should
become scientists. Their lives would be more worthy then. The rest of
the article just describes the same thought.
Saturday, February 7, 2015
February 7, 2015
Christianity, Science, Hatred, Egalitarianism, Technology, Mathematics, Sleep
If god does not exist then humans need a guiding ideology. If humans need a guiding ideology then it should be one of science. If it should be one of science then we should keep in mind our emotions. If we should keep in mind our emotions then we should keep in mind our hatred. If we should keep in mind our hatred then we should strive for egalitarianism. Of egalitarianism, I think that it should exist only by what it is needed for: to create a sustainable, happy, work-full place where people can do science only. What stops us from doing this is crime, indecency, and degeneracy. That is what I have hatred for. The hatred is against people who commit crimes, are indecent, and are in degeneracy. These people should be exterminated and their perpetrators should be as well because they allow it to happen and are of it themselves. These problems can be solved by technology. I am a novice mathematician and I think that many problems that are not solved by liberal-democracy and its individuals will be solved by the technology that allows us to sleep: such as, problem-solving, science, chemistry, biochemistry, genetics, genetic engineering and ethical workmanship - as controlled by Pure Communism. In my recent years, I have not slept well due to people acting out of degenerate qualities. I think that these people will be removed by right communism, by Pure Communism.
Christianity, Science, Hatred, Egalitarianism, Technology, Mathematics, Sleep
If god does not exist then humans need a guiding ideology. If humans need a guiding ideology then it should be one of science. If it should be one of science then we should keep in mind our emotions. If we should keep in mind our emotions then we should keep in mind our hatred. If we should keep in mind our hatred then we should strive for egalitarianism. Of egalitarianism, I think that it should exist only by what it is needed for: to create a sustainable, happy, work-full place where people can do science only. What stops us from doing this is crime, indecency, and degeneracy. That is what I have hatred for. The hatred is against people who commit crimes, are indecent, and are in degeneracy. These people should be exterminated and their perpetrators should be as well because they allow it to happen and are of it themselves. These problems can be solved by technology. I am a novice mathematician and I think that many problems that are not solved by liberal-democracy and its individuals will be solved by the technology that allows us to sleep: such as, problem-solving, science, chemistry, biochemistry, genetics, genetic engineering and ethical workmanship - as controlled by Pure Communism. In my recent years, I have not slept well due to people acting out of degenerate qualities. I think that these people will be removed by right communism, by Pure Communism.
1.) Technology and The Communist Party
If people like their work then they are happy. If people are happy then they do not commit crimes. If they do not commit crimes then there are less social problems. If there are less social problems then there is more work. If there is more work then there is more happiness. For this society to exist, there must be a group of engineers to support the technical service devices that are to do the maintenance work of society. Specifically mathematics and science are to be the main curriculum of the education students receive. Secondly, if intellectual pursuit is sought in itself, as a mode of organization that has embedded the lifestyles of vegetarianism and drug-free culture then no undesirable problems will exist - with reference to criminal activity. Thirdly, because electronic machines are the underlying features of this society and because it is not ideal that humans be in antagonism toward each other then humans need to exchange employment roles with reference to the part of civilization that does the labor sector for us. I mean with reference to the devices that will do the labor for us.
Translation to Spanish:
1.) La tecnología y el Partido Comunista Si a la gente le gusta su trabajo, a continuación, son felices. Si las personas son felices, no cometen delitos. Si no cometen delitos, hay menos problemas sociales. Si hay menos problemas sociales, hay más trabajo. Si hay más trabajo, hay más felicidad. Para esta sociedad de existir, no deben ser un grupo de ingenieros para apoyar el servicio técnico los dispositivos que tienen que hacer los trabajos de mantenimiento de la sociedad. En concreto las matemáticas y las ciencias han de ser los principales estudios de la educación los estudiantes reciben. En segundo lugar, si se busca búsqueda intelectual en sí mismo, como un modo de organización que ha incrustado el estilo de vida del vegetarianismo y cultura libre de drogas, a continuación, no existen problemas indeseables, con referencia a la actividad criminal. En tercer lugar, porque las máquinas electrónicas son las características de esta sociedad y porque no es ideal que los seres humanos que en el antagonismo hacia los otros, los seres humanos necesitamos empleo intercambio roles con relación a la parte de la civilización, que el sector laboral no para nosotros. Me refiero con referencia a los dispositivos que hará el trabajo por nosotros.
Translated with http://www.spanishdict.com/translation
If people like their work then they are happy. If people are happy then they do not commit crimes. If they do not commit crimes then there are less social problems. If there are less social problems then there is more work. If there is more work then there is more happiness. For this society to exist, there must be a group of engineers to support the technical service devices that are to do the maintenance work of society. Specifically mathematics and science are to be the main curriculum of the education students receive. Secondly, if intellectual pursuit is sought in itself, as a mode of organization that has embedded the lifestyles of vegetarianism and drug-free culture then no undesirable problems will exist - with reference to criminal activity. Thirdly, because electronic machines are the underlying features of this society and because it is not ideal that humans be in antagonism toward each other then humans need to exchange employment roles with reference to the part of civilization that does the labor sector for us. I mean with reference to the devices that will do the labor for us.
Translation to Spanish:
1.) La tecnología y el Partido Comunista Si a la gente le gusta su trabajo, a continuación, son felices. Si las personas son felices, no cometen delitos. Si no cometen delitos, hay menos problemas sociales. Si hay menos problemas sociales, hay más trabajo. Si hay más trabajo, hay más felicidad. Para esta sociedad de existir, no deben ser un grupo de ingenieros para apoyar el servicio técnico los dispositivos que tienen que hacer los trabajos de mantenimiento de la sociedad. En concreto las matemáticas y las ciencias han de ser los principales estudios de la educación los estudiantes reciben. En segundo lugar, si se busca búsqueda intelectual en sí mismo, como un modo de organización que ha incrustado el estilo de vida del vegetarianismo y cultura libre de drogas, a continuación, no existen problemas indeseables, con referencia a la actividad criminal. En tercer lugar, porque las máquinas electrónicas son las características de esta sociedad y porque no es ideal que los seres humanos que en el antagonismo hacia los otros, los seres humanos necesitamos empleo intercambio roles con relación a la parte de la civilización, que el sector laboral no para nosotros. Me refiero con referencia a los dispositivos que hará el trabajo por nosotros.
Translated with http://www.spanishdict.com/translation
Sunday, February 1, 2015
Wednesday, January 28, 2015
I don't think that people should use drugs, alcohol, pornography, group sex, meat, tobacco products etc. I think that everyone should be straight-edge.
I don't think that people should use drugs, alcohol, pornography, group sex, meat, tobacco products etc. I think that everyone should be straight-edge.
I don't think that people should use drugs, alcohol, pornography, group sex, meat, tobacco products etc. I think that everyone should be straight-edge.
I don't think that people should use drugs, alcohol, pornography, group sex, meat, tobacco products etc. I think that everyone should be straight-edge.
I don't think that people should use drugs, alcohol, pornography, group sex, meat, tobacco products etc. I think that everyone should be straight-edge.
I don't think that people should use drugs, alcohol, pornography, group sex, meat, tobacco products etc. I think that everyone should be straight-edge.
I don't think that people should use drugs, alcohol, pornography, group sex, meat, tobacco products etc. I think that everyone should be straight-edge.
Thursday, January 15, 2015
Friday, January 2, 2015
Victor Mazariegos
January 2, 2014
Brief comments About the present Global Economy
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/02/ususaeconomymanufacturingidUSKBN0K
B0UE20150102
If the US factory sector suffers end-of-year chill then the economy is not good. If the
economy is not good then the politics behind it are inferior.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/02/ususafedmesteridUSKBN0KB0WP201501
If the US federal key rate is increasing then the economy will not do well. If the economy
will not do well then many people will suffer.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/02/usmarketsoilidUSKBN0KB06A20150102
If oil prices are falling then businesses are not doing well. If businesses are not doing
well then the economy will not do well.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/02/uspmiindustrialoutputglobalidUSKBN0KB0
XT20150102
If global manufacturing growth is falling then the economy is not good. If the economy is
not good then the politics that organize it are inferior.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/02/usbrazilpetrobrasrousseffinsightidUSKBN
0KB0WZ20150102
If there is corruption in the oil business in Brazil then the economy there is not good. If
the economy in Brazil is not good then people will suffer.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/02/usglobaleconomyidUSKBN0KB0J9201501
02
If there is a lot of pressure to make the economy better then there is competititon. If
there is a lot of competition to make the economy better then there is no unity. If there is
no unity to make the economy better then the economies need more togetherness.
In conclusion, people need more solidarity so that their respective economies and the
overall economy does better. I think that the communist party would solve this problem.
*Addition.:
I think that what the global economy needs is more unity across rank and level organizational structures. If there is more unity across rank and level organizational structures then there is more productivity, and there is more stability.
January 2, 2014
Brief comments About the present Global Economy
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/02/ususaeconomymanufacturingidUSKBN0K
B0UE20150102
If the US factory sector suffers end-of-year chill then the economy is not good. If the
economy is not good then the politics behind it are inferior.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/02/ususafedmesteridUSKBN0KB0WP201501
If the US federal key rate is increasing then the economy will not do well. If the economy
will not do well then many people will suffer.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/02/usmarketsoilidUSKBN0KB06A20150102
If oil prices are falling then businesses are not doing well. If businesses are not doing
well then the economy will not do well.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/02/uspmiindustrialoutputglobalidUSKBN0KB0
XT20150102
If global manufacturing growth is falling then the economy is not good. If the economy is
not good then the politics that organize it are inferior.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/02/usbrazilpetrobrasrousseffinsightidUSKBN
0KB0WZ20150102
If there is corruption in the oil business in Brazil then the economy there is not good. If
the economy in Brazil is not good then people will suffer.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/01/02/usglobaleconomyidUSKBN0KB0J9201501
02
If there is a lot of pressure to make the economy better then there is competititon. If
there is a lot of competition to make the economy better then there is no unity. If there is
no unity to make the economy better then the economies need more togetherness.
In conclusion, people need more solidarity so that their respective economies and the
overall economy does better. I think that the communist party would solve this problem.
*Addition.:
I think that what the global economy needs is more unity across rank and level organizational structures. If there is more unity across rank and level organizational structures then there is more productivity, and there is more stability.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)