About Degenerate People in Contemporary Education and Politics

Are the degenerate people of society becoming leaders in contemporary education and politics? And are they negatively affecting the U.S. population?

My thesis is that, yes, the degenerate people of society are becoming leaders in contemporary education and politics. Specifically, hip-hop, underground, and alternative cultures need to be put aside so that scientific, academic, and Christian-like thinking works better in society. To accomplish this, the funding of the poor should be removed, their social support removed (e.g., less rap, hip-hop, love songs etc. on television shows, advertisements, and movies). Possibly make voluntary and health-related euthanasia legally OK in a professional way. In my judgment, the degenerate should be removed from society so that they do not become leaders in contemporary education and politics and thereby negatively affect the U.S. population.

John Doe is a teacher who got his teaching credential at Stanford University. I was in his A.P. U.S. History class. In about fall 2008 John Doe argued that hip-hop music is OK at a public high school. He particularly gave us a work-sheet outlining how to write an essay. I thought the idea of a teacher thinking hip-hop music is acceptable in the classroom was odd.

The teacher argued that hip-hop expresses what it is like to be a poor person in the city. It follows that the music is normal because it helps the listener feel good, like classical music and traditional art. However, it does not help because it is dancing music and not quiet music. It does not help develop the mind and it is not useful for doing scientific work. Scientific work is what helps make the society do well. Therefore, hip-hop only makes society degenerate. So it shouldn't be allowed in the class-room and the teacher shouldn't talk about it.

Barack Obama is the current president of the United States. I first heard of him in high-school. I thought he was OK. I only thought he was OK because I thought Democrat politics helps poor people get better. Later when I was able to vote I voted for him because I thought he would continue to help poor people get better. I hadn't written about the ideas but did later read some polemics that my A.P. World History teacher suggested I read.

In retrospect Barack Obama's policies have a negligible effect on the U.S. population.

The president was cheered for in my classrooms at my high school in 2008. Later, I heard about him in urban neighborhoods being cheered for as well. There is a rap artist who follows him closely and copies him closely. Obama is famous among the black and they like him a lot, though their comments are contradictory. So he has black appeal. If Barack Obama has "black appeal" then politics is not doing well. Firstly, he goes on the radio and on television and tries to get more people to his side. He also sings love songs at traditional political dinners. Secondly, he claims to be Christian but the secular art and culture goes through more and has a greater effect.

Historically, it was the social unity through Christianity that allowed capitalism and democracy to work, in the transition from agriculture and monarchism to industry and new government. But, we see in the United States that this does not really work. There is much crime and people are being put in prison because of the law enforcement. I think this is a waste of resources. The criminals were not integrated well into the social system. At the point of prison they are worthless and leaving the facilities they do negligible work. So they should be euthanized.

In politics it is argued to how to decrease nuclear weapons in other countries and to improve health-care quality. Generally, either influence other countries or to attempt to help the poor. However, it is not argued how to make the country wealthier or better in itself - apart from others. So the country should be isolated and then social degeneracy like mainstream music, films, and non-scientific, non-academic, non-Christian culture put aside -- certainly not taught in public high schools. Therefore, the degenerate should be removed from contemporary education and politics by the means of cutting their funding and social support.

Jane Doe is a recent UC Berkeley graduate who now teaches at a public charter middle school. She majored in Spanish and Portugese Literature. She did poorly at UC Berkeley, writing many e-mails to teachers about having her being kept at the school. I suggested that she become a writer, not a teacher. She did it as backfall. The teacher, originally intending to study mathematics. I find that many street-like people, unhealthy, and taking their work lightly are going into leadership positions. There is also, an obese black woman from a program that worked at the high school I attended. She was obese and dressed like a street person as well.

If new public leaders are unhealthy, think the poor are OK; then technology is not being used well. If technology is not being used well then the people who do not use it well need to be removed. Their funding needs to be cut. I would not like to see more mainstream, hip-hop culture because it does not result in good scientific thinking, I would not like to see more "black appeal" in politics because it does not result in an advanced society, and I would not like to see technology being used badly. I don't want to these items in existence because they do not lead to a better society that wouldn't negatively affect my work. They do not help the environment in a positive way. So, degenerate people in contemporary education and politics should be removed by cutting their social support in society.
  

 

A note about Barack Obama's policies and its negligible effect on the U.S. population

President Barack Obama's policies had a negligible positive effect on the U.S. population. It was  a waste of resources really because if he was to spend the money given to run the administration on other items then there would be a greater positive effect on the U.S. population. So the policies were a negative unit, including his administration. Certainly not a positive change.

Firstly, the LGBT issues are not as important as the social degeneracy occurring in the United States. If people spend their time using technology for inferior activities then the society will break down. Some gay guys get into trouble but really bullying is a part of a greater problem in which students, workers, and employees are not getting along well. The problem of social degeneracy.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/158066/special-report-adults-identify-lgbt.aspx
There aren't as many gay people, or "LGBT" people as other people. So their problems are not as important as the problems of poverty. However, even if there is poverty people can get along well. Recently, on the news Barack Obama claimed that gay conversion therapy isn't good for youths. I agree. However, it is not as important as saying, we should get along well and respect each other more in order to decrease the amount of social degeneracy that results in crime, bullying, and disrespect. Bullying and disrespect are crimes themselves in many places. I think that the LGBT community has too much acceptance and diversity and acceptance atmospheres are becoming to prevalent because there are parties on the street in the bay area celebrating the choice of sex. I think it's unimportant.

If people do not get along in the workplace or on the streets then the services we provide to each other do not work well.
Secondly, health-care is not as important as the practice of science in the United States. If people spend less time eating bad foods, instead eating vegetables, then they will have more time to study a science or take up a scientific endeavor such as physics, math, or computer science. Obese people spend their time at the hospital waiting for diabetes medication but they could have eaten vegetable foods instead and studied chemistry to synthesize better food. Medicine can become more accurate as well.

If people think better in the workplace or on the streets by eating better, e.g. vegetable foods drinking water, etc. and by having studied or in the process of studying a hard science such as chemistry or physics then their minds are better at solving problems and less prone to making bad decisions. Physical exercise is good too. I'm one of the few people I see on the street running in the morning.
Thirdly, social mobility is not as important as the practice of removing social degeneracy in the United States. I think that people will always have more money, in the sense that there will always be an attempt to make a greater concentration of money at the top of a pyramidal-like structure in the United States. So to try to make it easier for others to do so is sort of futile because it only contributes to a greater tension that will result in bad protests. The protests haven't solved the problem of poverty. Liberal-democracy only really works if the people are Christian or think alike. However, in the United States the people do not think alike. Generally, they do not think with a belief so they end up fighting each other. In this scramble, the bad guy usually wins because as we see, Barack Obama, who has top influence right now just uses it for negligible work and a nice picture. Both protesting and government work doesn't do much. I think that people are supposed to form a party more important than the Democrat and than the Republican Party, The Communist Party.

Recently it seems that criminals and street people were combined into the Security Enforcement patrol. The CIA, possibly. I think I heard some birds' singing being overlayed with street gang noise.
I think that instead of people making worthless noise they should form a party to isolate the country so that it can focus on domestic policies and solve the problems social degeneracy, lack of scientific thinking, and abundance of pollution.

The British Empire and The USSR

Did the British empire promise its colonial subjects a beneficial outcome regarding the quality of the society? Does this thereby prove that the USSR was an imperial power as well during the same time?

My thesis is that the British empire did not promise its colonial subjects a beneficial outcome, but did make things easier for themselves. The items that enabled the British empire to work better unintentionally helped the Africans. Though the aid and its effect was unsignificant, as seen today. In contrast, the promises in the musical compositions sung by laborers in the West  about the time of revolution were realized and were evident, concrete. Therefore, the USSR was not an imperial power. It was a legitimate Communist government.

The compositions that are the White Man's burden are the examples that the European imperialism was setting to Africa and other colonies.

 They show a man washing hands. They say, "[the natives] are captured and are half-devils." If they are trying to teach the subjects cleanliness and the idea that they are enslaved and are partially bad, then they are asserting a superiority. If the superiority asserted by the British imperialism made the natives look bad then the imperialism  did not suggest a better outcome for the natives. So the intention was to extract resources. The superior infrastructure we see today is negligible because it is weak and was only introductory then, needed for the work of the empire. Therefore, the British empire did not create a better country for the Africans.

 Therefore, its outcome; AIDS, tribal warfare, terrorist origins etc. , is not indicative of a promise.
 In contrast, the USSR immediately saw an increase in the literacy of the population and a decrease in crime - with many being sent to the gulag, a massive prison in Russia's territory. Leisure time also increased, so there were more easy activities to do. Therefore, health was better. There, was in the 1960s a type of health-care, therefore the quality of life was superior. At its beginning, as known in labor songs such as the Internationale and the anthem of the USSR itself, unity in the work-place, freedom from arbitrary bosses and an increase in prosperity were idealized and sung about. Therefore, the intent was clear to make a better society. It was later evident that the items were realized and seen. Therefore, the USSR was not an imperial power. Therefore, the USSR was a legitimate Socialist country.

The Closet by Victor Mazariegos

    I turn around to see my reflection in the mirror. The mirror is new, shines brightly at the edges; it has a silver-gold plated border, and I look good in it. I feel good about myself. The lights in the room are on, the computer is on (a slim black pc-laptop). The computer has its desktop set to a picture of a forest and a stream. In the picture is me, standing alone in a white t-shirt with a design and I'm wearing blue shorts. The stream is a rich blue and the trees in the background are colorfully green and the stems are a dark brown. I go to google maps and set my path. Erik Satie plays in the background on the eletronic music player. I print it. Next, I shower, put my clothes on, and take my backpack. I leave. On the way up the hill from my parents' apartment I breathe heavily and listen to Erik Satie. Gnossienne No. 3 plays through the white ear buds. The night starts. It was about 7: 30 pm when I left my parents' apartment. It was slightly dark already. It's 9 pm now. My parents think I'm going to my friends house to play music. I'm not. I'm going to meet another young man at a park that is up the street from my house. We might hike the dirt paths there.
    "Hello," I say to the young adult in a UC Berkeley t-shirt. "Hi," he says, "Why do you study mathematics?" he asks. I say, "Because it's interesting." We met through craigslist.  We do talk much, we share a conversation about classical music. He says he started playing piano at age 8. I started playing piano at the same age. We both grew up in the San Francisco bay area. Him in the hills of Berkeley, me in the hills of Oakland. I ride my bike a lot, I tell him. We're very much alike, he also likes to ride his bike. We're both slim and wear our hair short. He is white, I am latino, white as well. "Why do you study American history?" I ask, and add, "I find it very straightforward, mostly essay writing." He says, "It's fun, I plan to teach it later." The reason I met him is because I don't have many friends, I have a few that I talk to at school but we study most of the time and I finish early so I went on a walk this evening, this weekened. I look down at my black Nike shoes and think of my girlfriend. I wonder what she's doing tonight. I think of a funny youtube video. It's the one about where a group of youths prank an old man and the old man says, "fuck you," and the youths say "fuck you too." It went viral. He makes a comment.
    I take out my knife. I stab him in the head. Blood pours out, but I can't really see it. I stab him again, in the face.  He cries. He didn't suspect it. He dies painfully, twitching, not making much noise. Blood gets on his shirt and I take out my iPhone and shine the light from my iPhone on his white shirt. I let him die on the dark tree path and he dies and rots there. Two nights later his death is on the news. I don't know why I do it. It feels good. It's OK. It makes me feel OK. Happy, I go back down the hill with my knife in my black packpack. I look in the mirror, the new mirror. It looks cool. I look good. I have my hair parted to the side my hair looks black but really it's brown and it shines from olive oil. My parents ask me if I want dinner, this is the Saturday following the Friday I killed the other young man. I say no and I go to my closet. I open it and there I see a corpse and it's bloody and it's red and I laugh.  The next weekend, I go ride my bicycle a black road bicycle, a Fuji - City Bike. It's black and the paint always looks new. That day I rode my bicycle I go to my closet and I look and it's the guy I killed. His corpse is bloody and red and I laugh.